Skip to content
  • NationalNAT
  • North CentralNC
  • NortheastNE
  • SouthernS
  • WesternW

Sustainable Agriculture
Research and Education

  • News
    • News
    • Profiles from the Field
    • Media Contacts
    • Social Media
    • Join Our Mailing List
  • About SARE
    • About SARE
    • SARE’s Four Regions
    • SARE Outreach
    • Contact Us
    • Staff
  • What We Do
    • What We Do
    • Grants
    • Professional Development
    • Education and Outreach
    • What is Sustainable Agriculture?
    • Impacts from the Field
    • Events
  • Where We Work
    • Where We Work
    • Regional Programs
    • State Coordinators
    • Funded Grants in Your State
  • Grants
    • Grants
    • Manage a Grant
  • Projects
    • Search Projects
    • Manage a Grant
  • Resources and Learning
    • Search All Resources
    • By Region
      • North Central
      • Northeast
      • South
      • West
    • By Topic
      • Cover Crops
      • On-Farm Energy
      • Farm to Table
      • Season Extension
    • From SARE
      • SARE Outreach Resources
      • What's New?
      • Available in Print
      • Continuing Education Program
      • Search Grants
  • Search
  • Shopping Cart
SARE » Products » Page 52

Search Results Within This Resource:

Managing Alternative Pollinators handbook cover featuring a picture of bees and blooming trees

Managing Alternative Pollinators

A Handbook for Beekeepers, Growers and Conservationists

View Resource »
Can't Find It? Filters:
specific publication: 75272 reset

Showing 511-520 of 1303 results

Prev 1 … 50 51 52 53 54 … 131 Next
www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-10-soil-fertility-management plant-tissue-analysis

Plant Tissue Analysis

Plant tissue analysis complements fertilizer management strategies based on soil testing. Search the web for “sampling for plant analysis” to find guides, such as North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services’ “Sampling for Plant Analysis” [17], to ensure the sample is from the appropriate plant tissue and growth stage. Following standard sampling guidelines will […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-10-soil-fertility-management animal-waste-management

Animal Waste Management

With no-till cropping systems, fertilizers and animal-waste nutrients are applied to the soil surface or surface residue and remain there until water infiltration carries them into the soil. The rate of microbial decomposition will be slower than with the conventional practice of incorporating animal waste, and this delays the availability of nutrients. As a result, […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-10-soil-fertility-management minimizing-nitrogen-loss

Minimizing Nitrogen Loss

FIGURE 10.9. The nitrogen cycle. The nitrogen cycle describes the many ways nitrogen can change forms in the environment, including changes that occur on farmland (Figure 10.9). There are several common nitrogen fertilizer formulations. Most are granules or liquids containing urea, ammonium or nitrate. Manures, legume cover crops or residual plant nutrients from previous crops […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-10-soil-fertility-management soil-testing-and-fertility-management

Soil Testing and Fertility Management

Soil testing is the basis for an effective soil fertility management program. The following standard principles apply whether using conventional or conservation tillage: Prior to sampling, check with the laboratory for information concerning sampling depth, packaging, information forms, typical laboratory turnaround time, analyses performed and fees. Contact information for state laboratories in the Southeast can […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-10-soil-fertility-management effects-on-soil-fertility-management

Effects on Soil Fertility Management

FIGURE 10.1. Sediment loss in conservation tillage as a percentage of sediment loss with no-till in Tennessee with full-season soybeans (TN 1) and double-crop soybeans (TN 2) [33], and in North Carolina with cotton (NC 1) or corn (NC 2) [9]. Tillage and residue-management practices have numerous complex effects on soil. These effects are influenced […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-10-soil-fertility-management

Chapter 10: Soil Fertility Management

Carl R. Crozier, North Carolina State University Don D. Tyler, University of Tennessee Greg D. Hoyt, North Carolina State University Conservation tillage practices result in changes that affect soil fertility management on the farm. Application methods used in conservation tillage influence the distribution of lime and fertilizer in the soil profile and over the field. […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-9-planting-in-cover-crop-residue summary-10

Chapter 9 Summary

When rolling/crimping without supplemental herbicide, terminate the cover crop at the optimal growth stage and at least three weeks before cash crop planting. If weather in the spring is wet or cold, and cover crop termination is delayed, herbicide application is recommended to speed up termination. Application rates less than label rate are effective in […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-9-planting-in-cover-crop-residue no-till-vegetable-transplanter

No-Till Vegetable Transplanter

Commercially available no-till vegetable transplanters are usually equipped with a coulter to cut through residue. The RJ transplanter, manufactured in Canada, is a typical example. It has a spring-loaded 20-inch, turbo-fluted coulter, followed by a double-disk opener and a shoe with a kicker mechanism to place the transplants in the soil. Angled steel press wheels […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-9-planting-in-cover-crop-residue no-till-planters-for-field-crops

No-Till Planters for Field Crops

The objective when no-till planting in cover crop residues is adequate seed-to-soil contact at a desired seeding depth. Planters designed for operation in residues are heavier than conventional planters. The additional weight allows the planter to maintain the desired seeding depth in rough soil conditions and prevents the planter from floating across the soil surface, […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-9-planting-in-cover-crop-residue in-row-subsoiling-combined-with-planting

In-Row Subsoiling Combined With Planting

FIGURE 9.8. Wide-strip subsoiler. Picture shows (a) a narrow fluted coulter with attached row cleaners on the front of the shank, (b) splitter points attached to the shank, (c) additional coulters (ripper type) and (d) a drag chain sheet. In the Southeast, crops in conservation tillage systems are planted in combination with in-row subsoiling, usually […]

Prev 1 … 50 51 52 53 54 … 131 Next
Bot search not allowed

Explore More From SARE Outreach

  • What's New?
  • Featured Content
  • Available in Print
  • Disponible en Español
  • Resources From Grants

Sign up for all the latest news and updates from SARE

Sign Up For Our Newsletters
Navigation
  • What we do
  • Where we work
  • Grant programs
  • Resources and learning
  • SARE Projects Application and Reporting
Sites
  • National SARE
  • North Central SARE
  • Northeast SARE
  • Southern SARE
  • Western SARE
Our Location
  • University of Maryland
    Symons Hall, Room 1296
    7998 Regents Drive
    College Park, MD 20742-5505
  • Contact Us
Follow Us
  • Our facebook page
  • Our youtube page
  • Our twitter page
Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education University of Maryland US Department of Agriculture

This work is supported by the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program under a cooperative agreement with the University of Maryland, project award no. 2024-38640-42986, from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.


© 2026 Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education