Skip to content
  • NationalNAT
  • North CentralNC
  • NortheastNE
  • SouthernS
  • WesternW

Sustainable Agriculture
Research and Education

  • News
    • News
    • Profiles from the Field
    • Media Contacts
    • Social Media
    • Join Our Mailing List
  • About SARE
    • About SARE
    • SARE’s Four Regions
    • SARE Outreach
    • Contact Us
    • Staff
  • What We Do
    • What We Do
    • Grants
    • Professional Development
    • Education and Outreach
    • What is Sustainable Agriculture?
    • Impacts from the Field
    • Events
  • Where We Work
    • Where We Work
    • Regional Programs
    • State Coordinators
    • Funded Grants in Your State
  • Grants
    • Grants
    • Manage a Grant
  • Projects
    • Search Projects
    • Manage a Grant
  • Resources and Learning
    • Search All Resources
    • By Region
      • North Central
      • Northeast
      • South
      • West
    • By Topic
      • Cover Crops
      • On-Farm Energy
      • Farm to Table
      • Season Extension
    • From SARE
      • SARE Outreach Resources
      • What's New?
      • Available in Print
      • Continuing Education Program
      • Search Grants
  • Search
  • Shopping Cart
SARE » Products » Page 98

Search Results Within This Resource:

Managing Alternative Pollinators handbook cover featuring a picture of bees and blooming trees

Managing Alternative Pollinators

A Handbook for Beekeepers, Growers and Conservationists

View Resource »
Can't Find It? Filters:
specific publication: 75272 reset

Showing 971-980 of 1303 results

Prev 1 … 96 97 98 99 100 … 131 Next
www.sare.org publications selecting-cattle-to-improve-grazing-distribution-patterns-rangeland-health-and-water-quality management-implications

Management Implications

Selecting cattle with desirable grazing patterns and culling cattle with undesirable grazing patterns have been suggested as tools for improving distribution. One approach for such selection is to use breeds adapted to rugged and extensive rangelands. Research conducted as part of our first SARE-funded project (SW98-064) showed that cattle breeds developed in mountainous terrain utilize […]

www.sare.org publications in-house-composting-in-high-rise-caged-layer-facilities references-4

References

1. Thompson, S.A., P.M. Ndegwa, W.C. Merka and A.B. Webster. 2001. Reduction in layer manure weight and volume using an in-house layer manure composting system under field conditions. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 10:255-261. 2. Brown Bear Corporation, Corning Iowa: https://www.brownbearcorp.com/ 3. Rynk, R. (Ed). 1992. On-Farm Composting Handbook. Publication #54 of the Northeast Regional […]

www.sare.org publications in-house-composting-in-high-rise-caged-layer-facilities research-synopsis-4

Research Synopsis

The goal of SARE research project in-house composting in high-rise, caged layer facilities was to develop operational parameters for in-house composting. Specific objectives were to: 1) evaluate carbon source, rate, and turning frequency variables for their effects on compost temperatures; 2) evaluate amendments and process controls to reduce ammonia volatilization from composting manure; and 3) […]

www.sare.org publications in-house-composting-in-high-rise-caged-layer-facilities economic-evaluation

Economic Evaluation

Cooperators on this project reported cost savings associated with reduced pesticide use for fly control, removal of less material from the buildings at cleanout, and the production of a higher value and saleable product. Additional costs were incurred for turning the compost. Based on partial budget analysis including these costs, annual savings equaled $6,000 per […]

www.sare.org publications in-house-composting-in-high-rise-caged-layer-facilities managing-compost-inside-poultry-facilities managing-compost-inside-poultry-facilities-page-3

Managing Compost Inside Poultry Facilities, Page 3

Fly controlThe farmer cooperators on this SARE research project were able to discontinue using a feed-based larvicide and shift to topical applications of an insecticide when needed as long as the material was managed appropriately to maintain high temperatures. Fly outbreaks, though infrequent, did occur when equipment broke down and turning schedules could not be […]

www.sare.org publications in-house-composting-in-high-rise-caged-layer-facilities managing-compost-inside-poultry-facilities managing-compost-inside-poultry-facilities-page-2

Managing Compost Inside Poultry Facilities, Page 2

Turning frequencyResearch demonstrated the importance of turning frequency on maintaining compost temperatures above the lethal limit for fly larvae. Results showed that critical temperatures could be achieved by turning the material once every 2 to 3 days (Figure 2). Missed turning events resulted in a rapid drop in temperatures below the critical value (see insert […]

www.sare.org publications in-house-composting-in-high-rise-caged-layer-facilities managing-compost-inside-poultry-facilities

Managing Compost Inside Poultry Facilities

Details on composting processes and methods are outside the scope of this article but are presented elsewhere in comprehensive manuals [3]. Two of the most important factors for successful in-house composting are the appropriate C:N ratio and moisture content of the material. Carbon to nitrogen ratio should be in the range of 20:1 to 40:1, […]

www.sare.org publications in-house-composting-in-high-rise-caged-layer-facilities overview-of-high-rise-caged-layer-facilities-and-in-house-composting

Overview of High-Rise, Caged Layer Facilities and In-House Composting

High-rise, Caged Layer Facilities The standard structure design for high-rise, caged layer facilities involves housing poultry in offset-stacked cages in the upper floor of the structure. Manure from the cages is directed with plastic sheeting into the storage area below (Figure 1). Manure may accumulate for several months or more before buildings are cleaned out. […]

www.sare.org publications a-sustainable-approach-to-controlling-honey-bee-diseases-and-varroa-mites references-3

References

Arathi, H.S. and M. Spivak. 2001. Influence of colony genotypic composition on the performance of hygienic behavior in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L). Animal Behavior 62: 57–66. Gramacho, K.P. and M. Spivak. 2003. Differences in olfactory sensitivity and behavioral responses among honey bees bred for hygienic behavior. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54: 472–479. Harbo, J.R. […]

www.sare.org publications a-sustainable-approach-to-controlling-honey-bee-diseases-and-varroa-mites research-synopsis-3

Research Synopsis

Our goal is to breed honey bees, Apis mellifera, resistant to diseases and parasitic mites to reduce the amount of antibiotics and pesticides used in bee colonies, and to ensure that our breeding methods and stock are accessible to beekeepers everywhere. We bred a line of bees for hygienic behavior, called the “MN Hygienic Line.” […]

Prev 1 … 96 97 98 99 100 … 131 Next
Bot search not allowed

Explore More From SARE Outreach

  • What's New?
  • Featured Content
  • Available in Print
  • Disponible en Español
  • Resources From Grants

Sign up for all the latest news and updates from SARE

Sign Up For Our Newsletters
Navigation
  • What we do
  • Where we work
  • Grant programs
  • Resources and learning
  • SARE Projects Application and Reporting
Sites
  • National SARE
  • North Central SARE
  • Northeast SARE
  • Southern SARE
  • Western SARE
Our Location
  • University of Maryland
    Symons Hall, Room 1296
    7998 Regents Drive
    College Park, MD 20742-5505
  • Contact Us
Follow Us
  • Our facebook page
  • Our youtube page
  • Our twitter page
Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education University of Maryland US Department of Agriculture

This work is supported by the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program under a cooperative agreement with the University of Maryland, project award no. 2024-38640-42986, from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.


© 2026 Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education