Skip to content
  • NationalNAT
  • North CentralNC
  • NortheastNE
  • SouthernS
  • WesternW

Sustainable Agriculture
Research and Education

  • News
    • News
    • Profiles from the Field
    • Media Contacts
    • Social Media
    • Join Our Mailing List
  • About SARE
    • About SARE
    • SARE’s Four Regions
    • SARE Outreach
    • Contact Us
    • Staff
  • What We Do
    • What We Do
    • Grants
    • Professional Development
    • Education and Outreach
    • What is Sustainable Agriculture?
    • Impacts from the Field
    • Events
  • Where We Work
    • Where We Work
    • Regional Programs
    • State Coordinators
    • Funded Grants in Your State
  • Grants
    • Grants
    • Manage a Grant
  • Projects
    • Search Projects
    • Manage a Grant
  • Resources and Learning
    • Search All Resources
    • By Region
      • North Central
      • Northeast
      • South
      • West
    • By Topic
      • Cover Crops
      • On-Farm Energy
      • Farm to Table
      • Season Extension
    • From SARE
      • SARE Outreach Resources
      • What's New?
      • Available in Print
      • Continuing Education Program
      • Search Grants
  • Search
  • Shopping Cart
SARE » Products » Page 48

Search Results Within This Resource:

Managing Alternative Pollinators handbook cover featuring a picture of bees and blooming trees

Managing Alternative Pollinators

A Handbook for Beekeepers, Growers and Conservationists

View Resource »
Can't Find It? Filters:
specific publication: 75272 reset

Showing 471-480 of 1303 results

Prev 1 … 46 47 48 49 50 … 131 Next
www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-17-tennessee-valley-and-sandstone-plateau-region-case-studies specific-management-considerations

Specific Management Considerations

In the mid-1980s, growers in the region realized the need to adopt conservation practices on highly erodible cropland. However, techniques such as high-residue management, in-row subsoiling and strip tillage, which work well on the sandier Coastal Plain soils of southern Alabama and southern Georgia, did not do as well as conventional tillage with cotton in […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-17-tennessee-valley-and-sandstone-plateau-region-case-studies crop-selections-and-crop-rotations

Crop Selections and Crop Rotations

The primary cash crops grown in the ridges and valley are cotton, corn, soybeans and wheat. Prior to the 1980s, some specialty crops were grown on the Sand Mountain soils, including white potatoes, sweet potatoes, pimento peppers, tomatoes and small patches of other vegetables. But, the total acreage of these crops was small compared to […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-17-tennessee-valley-and-sandstone-plateau-region-case-studies

Chapter 17: Tennessee Valley and Sandstone Plateau Region Case Studies

Charles C. Mitchell, Auburn University Charles H. Burmester, Auburn University The Tennessee Valley and Sandstone Plateau region of northern Alabama is part of two major land resource areas (MLRA) as defined by USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS): MLRA 128 (Southern Appalachian Ridges and Valleys) and MLRA 129 (Sand Mountain) (Figure 17.1). MLRA 128 is […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-16-biofuel-feedstock-production-crop-residues-and-dedicated-bioenergy-crops summary-17

Chapter 16 Summary

Today, agriculture is at a crossroads. It is receiving increased attention as the nation is concerned about its ability to meet food, feed and fiber demands along with increasing fuel demands. This chapter examines the use of crop residues in a conservation tillage system as a source of cellulosic fuel, as well as the economic […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-16-biofuel-feedstock-production-crop-residues-and-dedicated-bioenergy-crops switchgrass-production-cost-case-study

Switchgrass Production Cost Case Study

Table 16.2 summarizes several switchgrass production cost scenarios based on a five-year planning horizon and a 10-year planning horizon. The baseline scenarios look at the cost of production without replanting costs, storage costs, transportation costs and BCAP incentives. Then, these other cost components and incentives are included to determine their impact on the cost per […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-16-biofuel-feedstock-production-crop-residues-and-dedicated-bioenergy-crops switchgrass-production-systems

Switchgrass Production Systems

In this section, an economic framework is presented for deciding whether to plant switchgrass as a dedicated energy crop. Emerging issues in the establishment, production, harvest and handling of switchgrass are also discussed. Finally, an overview of policy incentives designed to encourage switchgrass plantings on private landholdings is presented. Farm managers are faced with four […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-16-biofuel-feedstock-production-crop-residues-and-dedicated-bioenergy-crops dedicated-energy-crop-production-systems

Dedicated Energy Crop Production Systems

The potential for dedicated energy crops to further energy security and environmental sustainability goals depends on their ability to generate farm income. Despite the best intentions of policymakers, realization of these broader goals will fall short without market incentives that make energy crop plantings economically competitive with alternative farm enterprises. There are a number of […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-16-biofuel-feedstock-production-crop-residues-and-dedicated-bioenergy-crops crop-residues-as-a-bioenergy-feedstock

Crop Residues as a Bioenergy Feedstock

Much has been written about using crop residues as a bioenergy feedstock. In the mid- to late-1970s, energy prices soared, which led to discussion about using crop residues for energy [1, 18]. In 2003, the DOE shifted interest from dedicated energy crops to crop residues such as corn stover and wheat straw [70]. Kim and […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-16-biofuel-feedstock-production-crop-residues-and-dedicated-bioenergy-crops

Chapter 16: Biofuel Feedstock Production: Crop Residues and Dedicated Bioenergy Crops

Burton C. English, University of Tennessee Daniel F. Mooney, University of Wisconsin James A. Larson, University of Tennessee Don Tyler, University of Tennessee Dustin K. Toliver, Huvepharma, Inc Today’s economy is primarily based on the use of fossil fuel, but the potential of renewable alternatives, such as bioenergy, is being evaluated. The rationale for this […]

www.sare.org publications conservation-tillage-systems-in-the-southeast chapter-15-conservation-economics-budgeting-cover-crops-and-government-programs summary-16

Chapter 15 Summary

Transitioning from a conventional cropping system to a conservation system that uses both reduced tillage and cover crops will change the economics of your farm operation. Partial budgeting and enterprise budgets are two tools described in this chapter that can help estimate how changes in management practices might affect the bottom line. Partial budgeting isolates […]

Prev 1 … 46 47 48 49 50 … 131 Next
Bot search not allowed

Explore More From SARE Outreach

  • What's New?
  • Featured Content
  • Available in Print
  • Disponible en Español
  • Resources From Grants

Sign up for all the latest news and updates from SARE

Sign Up For Our Newsletters
Navigation
  • What we do
  • Where we work
  • Grant programs
  • Resources and learning
  • SARE Projects Application and Reporting
Sites
  • National SARE
  • North Central SARE
  • Northeast SARE
  • Southern SARE
  • Western SARE
Our Location
  • University of Maryland
    Symons Hall, Room 1296
    7998 Regents Drive
    College Park, MD 20742-5505
  • Contact Us
Follow Us
  • Our facebook page
  • Our youtube page
  • Our twitter page
Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education University of Maryland US Department of Agriculture

This work is supported by the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program under a cooperative agreement with the University of Maryland, project award no. 2024-38640-42986, from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.


© 2026 Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education