• WebStore |
  • Advanced Search |
  • MySARE Login |
  • SARE Social Media |
  • Contact Us |
  • SANET Listserv |
  • Low Bandwidth |
Search MySARE Reports
  • Grants
    • Apply for a Grant
    • Funded Grants in Your State
  • Project Reports
    • Submit a Report
    • Search the Database
    • Project Search Tips
    • About Project Reports
    • About Search Results
    • Project Products
  • Learning Center
    • Books
    • Bulletins
    • Fact Sheets
    • Topic Rooms
    • From the Field
    • Newsletters
    • Multimedia
    • Courses and Curricula
    • Project Products
    • SARE Biennial Reports
    • SANET Listserv
    • SARE Program Materials
    • Conference Materials
    • WebStore
  • Professional Development
    • PDP Overview
    • Fellows & Search for Excellence Programs
    • Sample PDP Grant Projects
    • Educator Curriculum Guides
    • National Continuing Education Program
    • State Coordinator Contact Information
  • State Programs
    • State Coordinator Program Overview
    • State Coordinator Contact Information
    • Funded Grants in Your State
  • Events
    • Event Calendar
    • Past Conferences
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • SARE in the News
    • Media Contacts
    • Newsletters
    • Media Toolkit
    • A Guide To This Site
    • SARE and Social Media
  • About SARE
    • SARE's Four Regions
    • SARE Grants
    • Learning Center
    • Professional Development
    • SARE Outreach
    • Historical Timeline
    • Staff
    • Vision & Mission
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • What is Sustainable Agriculture?
  • Home»
  • Learning Center»
  • Fact Sheets»
  • Integrated Pest Management for Varroa Destructor in the Northeastern United States using Drone Brood Removal and Formic Acid»
  • Text Version»
  • IPM Non-Chemical Control Methods
facebook
Twitter
YouTube
- + Font Size
Print
Share

Text Version

  • Origins and Distribution of V. destructor
  • Symptoms and Damage of V. destructor
  • Life Cycle of V. destructor
  • Transmission of V. destructor
  • Monitoring and Thresholds
  • Rationale for IPM Program
  • IPM Chemical Control Methods
  • IPM Non-Chemical Control Methods
    • IPM Non-Chemical Control Methods, Page 2
  • Treatment Regimes
  • Important Terms
  • Research Synopsis
  • References
  • Printable Version

Can't find something? Ask or send feedback.

SARE's mission is to advance—to the whole of American agriculture—innovations that improve profitability, stewardship and quality of life by investing in groundbreaking research and education. SARE's vision is...

IPM Non-Chemical Control Methods

IPM Non-Chemical Control Methods

Drone brood removal research
Mites are found most often on drone brood where they produce about twice as many offspring as on worker brood. Therefore, by removing capped drone brood from an infected colony, you remove a disproportionately large number of mites without affecting the worker population, and you remove those mites with the highest fecundity. Research at Dyce Laboratory for Honey Bee Studies at Cornell University has shown that the periodic removal of drone brood from a colony allows a beekeeper to skip the usual spring treatment, keep mite levels low throughout the summer and prevent fall collapse (figure 1). It may also eliminate the need for a fall pesticide treatment. The only way to determine that is to estimate the pest density on a colony-by-colony basis after removing the fall honey crop.

Implementation: You will need four drone combs per colony to use this method. Drone foundation can be purchased from several supply houses. The foundation is wired into frames and drawn out by colonies. One piece plastic drone combs are also available. Use two deep hive bodies for brood chambers, and separate them from the honey supers with a queen excluder. Cull worker combs in the brood nest with more than 1 to 2 square inches of drone cells (photo H). Remember! The goal is to get the colony to consolidate all of its drone production in the removable drone combs.

Place two drone combs in the upper brood chamber, one or two combs in from each side. Visit your colony every 26 to 28 days, remove the drone combs (photo I) and replace them with the drone combs that you removed on the previous replacement date. Place the combs of capped drone brood in a freezer, and keep them there until you are ready for your next exchange. Allow frozen drone combs to come to ambient temperature before placing them back in a colony. Be sure to visit your bees at least every 28 days to exchange combs because you don't want too many drones actually emerging in your hive. If a drone comb becomes filled with honey, you will need to substitute an empty drone comb and extract the honey before reusing it. In the north, you can exchange combs up to six times a season using a 28-day interval between exchanges. The more often you exchange combs, the more you will suppress the mite population. The drone brood removal method has no known deleterious effects on colonies, and honey production may be marginally increased.

figure 1

comb of capped drone brood
Photo H. Comb of capped drone brood being removed from colony.
worker comb with excess drone cells
Photo I. A worker comb with excess drone cells. Such a comb is best culled and replaced with a comb of 95-100% worker cells.

Page: 1 | 2

Top

You are reading the SARE fact sheet Integrated Pest Management for Varroa Destructor in the Northeastern United States Using Drone Brood Removal and Formic Acid.

Order this publication.

25th SARE logo USDA Logo

1122 Patapsco Building | University of Maryland | College Park, MD 20742-6715

This Web site is maintained by the national outreach office of the SARE program, supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

North Central SARE | Northeast SARE | Southern SARE | Western SARE

Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education ©2012

  • Help |
  • RSS Feeds |
  • A Guide To This Site