Re: Bio-Dynamics

jhaskett@asrr.arsusda.gov
Thu, 27 Apr 1995 10:28:50 -0400 (EDT)

Call the question reductionist or call it common sense, it remains
does the technique work? That is, does it have any measurable benefit,
or could the rest of the whole continue on quite happily performing
at some useful level without it. Since the use of these techniques,
theories and explainations are what set Biodynamics apart from other
forms of agriculture, I think it is a fair question.

Cheers,
Jonathan Haskett

On Thu, 27 Apr 1995, Dick Dale wrote:

> I wanted to respond to the posts a couple weeks earlier but couldn't find
> the time. Some people were asking, What's special or different about
> Bio-Dynamics? and Where's the proof that it works? Both excellent questions.
>
> A very good short introduction to B.D> was written by Herbert H. Koepf in
> the book "Biological Husbandry: A Scientific Approach to Organic Farming",
> B. Stonehouse, Ed., London, 1981, pp.237-250. He summarizes three major
> aspects of biodynamic farming:
>
> "1. Sound farming and gardening techniques, no matter whether old or new;
> 2. Such principles as diversification, recycling, excluding objectionable
> chemicals, decentralized production and distribution etc., ideas held in
> other biological movements. Since the 1920's, biodynamic farmers have
> developed the execution of such principles, and also reintroduced useful
> traditional techniques; [my note - such as composting of farm manure]
> 3. The specific biodynamic measures and concepts as they evolve from
> Steiner's spiritual teaching, which mold the method into a consistent whole."
>
> Those questioners who want to examine only the third aspect miss the
> point. Yes, it is what is essentially different about Bio-Dynamics. But it
> fits into a rather larger whole. And I might say that I find the whole
> system to be conceptually finer than other biological systems of
> agriculture. One does need to approach it with an open mind.
>
> This same paper does discuss several scientific studies of B.D. and gives
> references for them. Most is European and not in English. I should point
> out that Will Brinton of the Woods End Agricultural Institute and the
> Michael Fields Agricultural Institute have done some recent research. I do
> not have access to it at this time but if they could be drawn into this
> discussion it would be fruitful.
>
> Finalyy, I have to say that some of the questions raised in the discussion
> seemed to be quite reductionist. To this, I can only reply: A flower is
> not (just) a reproductive structure. Food is not (just) a commodity. And
> farming is certainly not (not even just) an industry.
>
> Dick Dale
> Central NY Crop Management Association
>
>
>