Re: Bees/Vetch and the scientific process

Rodrigo Hernandez (rodrigo@unixg.ubc.ca)
Thu, 10 Mar 1994 08:57:04 -0800 (PST)

I completely agree with the statements contained herewith. As a graduate
student I have been very concerned with the "detachment" that sometimes
academia and its methods can have in regards to "day-in-day-out" farming
operations, or farming systems in poly-cultural environments. While there
seems to be lots of healthy debates on theories, lab results and
procedures, not enough of the substance contained therein translates to
METHODS that farmers can readily apply. It makes the search for answers so
much more frustrating...

On Thu, 10 Mar 1994 DRAEGER@WINROCK.ORG wrote:

>
>
>
> The honey bee-vetch connection!!
>
> I have a "testimonial" that I can back up with scientific principles and
> literature.
>
> Some years ago the local electrical company worked up a hillside on our
> land. This left a barren and very erosion prone hill side, in addition
> the top soil had been removed over the large part of the area. We tried
> to counter the erosion physically with litter cover and also planted the
> area to vetch. After a couple of unsuccessful seasons trying to
> cultivate vetch I established bee colonies in the immediate vicinity.
> The results were amazing. The vetch took off across the hill side within
> a couple of seasons. As a soils scientist working with biological
> nitrogen fixation, I did not immediately make the connection between the
> prolific growth of the vetch and the bee colonies. Some months later I
> read in Duke, (1981) "vetches are insect-pollinated, and bee hives near
> each field ensure pollination of flowers and increase seed yields."
>
> So for people trying to establish vetch as a cover crop, for hay, silage
> or pasture, bees colonies can make a significant difference in your
> yield. Besides, if you have the land, bees are a fascinating and
> productive addition to any farming system.
>
> Now that I have provided a technical tidbit for the last few people
> posting who want "METHODS" I would like to comment on the one track
> thought process of some scientists who speak of statistics, techniques
> etc... and how narrow definition is affecting our reputation with the
> public. Fellow Scientists! We are losing the respect and confidence of
> the public!! I'm not saying that we have to lead a PR campaign and I
> know that scientists are stereotypically socially inept, but we have to
> validate the experiences and testimonials of those who are LIVING WITH
> THE REALITY WHILE WE ARE TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS! I am speaking of
> agricultural sciences now (obviously not astronomy!). I see that we are
> having a battle of who will emerge the authority in sustainable
> agriculture. Many scientist don't realize that this is the public
> domain, that there are individuals, non-profit organizations, private
> sector businesses etc... who are leading the way in this movement. And
> many of them feel that science got us into the mess we are in. So we
> need to work together, to understand the overarching issues that are the
> combination of biological, physical, and social. That, in my opinion is
> the role I see SANET playing in facilitating the dialogue (or
> multilogue). So be nice and get along! Respect other opinions and try to
> see the grains of scientific truth and frame scientific questions (the
> true root of science) in the larger context!
>
> Kathy Draeger
> These are still my opinions and possibly those of other, but not
> necessarily those of my institute of employment.
>
>