(That is as friendly as I get since I have
the same bur under my saddle as Dan Nudell)
Today, Dan Nudell (dnudell@ndsuext.nodak.edu) wrote:
>
> BST Debate
>
> Please enough already! This used to be mail I enjoyed
> reading every day. There was always new and
> interesting information on a wide variety of topics and
> ideas. As a person interested in sustainable
> agriculture I enjoyed a chance to learn about issues
> and efforts that were not in the field I work in.
> While I am also grateful for both sides of the BST
> debate, the direction the debate is now heading is in
> my opinion better suited for another forum. Today
> there was another message this time to Dr Rassmussen
> that seems designed to ignite the fires again. Lets
> quit this wrangling and move on!
>
E-X-A-C-T-L-Y !!
I couldn't agree more - word for word.
Last week, I sent a transmission to Gabe Hegyes (/all
Sanetters) in response to his call for suggestions on
the splitting of SANET. I offered the suggestion
that SANET users put a term (in all caps) in the Subject
Line that designated the main subject area of the
transmission.