At 05:37 PM 10/8/98 -0500, Ronald Nigh wrote:
>Beth wrote:
>>I'm wondering what consideration may have been given to the use of ozone or
>>hydrogen peroxide in the sprout dilema. Anybody know? Anybody tried it?
>>(Please, anything but more chlorine!)
>>
>
>I agree. Chlorine is responsible for 80% of our chemical pollution problems
>and is probably involved in envrionmental disease and a number of other
>health problems. Banning its use would vastly simplify our toxic
>contamination problems all over the world. Trouble is there is a very
>powerful chlorine industry lobby in DC called the Chlorine Institute.
>America's most conservative public health organization has called for a ban
>on almost all of Cl's industrial uses.
>
>Ozone and other oxygen treatment methods are a perfectly viable alternative
>that should be explored. Thank you for pointing this out, Beth.
>
>
>Ronald Nigh
>Dana, A.C.
>Mexico, D.F. & San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas
>Tel. y FAX 525-666-73-66 (DF)
> 529-678-72-15 (Chiapas)
>danamex@mail.internet.com.mx
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
>To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
>"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".
>
To Unsubscribe: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with "unsubscribe sanet-mg".
To Subscribe to Digest: Email majordomo@ces.ncsu.edu with the command
"subscribe sanet-mg-digest".