 |
 |
 |
Cows from the hill climber
treatment resting on a ridge at the Thackeray Ranch. |
 |
Management Implications
Implications for Riparian Area Management
In critical areas such as riparian zones, stubble heights were 5
inches in pastures grazed by hill climbers and only 3 inches in
pastures grazed by bottom dweller cows (Figure
1). The differences in stubble heights observed between treatments
in this study would be economically important for many public-land
ranchers. A standard for grazing on riparian areas is often forage
stubble height of 4 to 5 inches [11,
12]. If stubble heights fall below
the standard, livestock are often required to be moved to a new
pasture or off the allotment. In this study, pastures grazed by
hill climbers had acceptable grazing levels based on this standard,
while grazing levels in pastures grazed by bottom dwellers were
not acceptable. Forage utilization measurements on upland slopes
also suggested that hill climbers used rough terrain more uniformly
than bottom dwellers. Forage utilization in pastures grazed by hill
climbers was affected less by slope, horizontal distance to water,
and vertical distance to water than pastures grazed by bottom dwellers.
For example, forage utilization declined by 0.33 percentage points
for every degree increase in slope in bottom dweller pastures, and
forage utilization only declined 0.25 percentage points for every
degree increase in slope in hill climber pastures. These results
demonstrate that selection for grazing distribution has the potential
to improve conditions of riparian and other sensitive areas that
have been heavily grazed in the past and to increase the use of
upland slopes that previously received little grazing.
The impact of this proposed practice (selection for distribution)
on performance of the herd is an important consideration for ranchers.
Research conducted in this SARE project found that the location
where cows grazed was not related to their pregnancy rates, weight
or body condition score. In addition, cattle that used high and
steep terrain had similar calf weaning weights as cows that remained
in gentle terrain near water. Selection of animals that spend more
time on high upland slopes and culling cows that graze in lower
terrain near water should not have any adverse impact on calf growth
or reproductive performance of the cows.
Summary and application.
When cows with clearly undesirable grazing patterns are identified,
culling the animals or separating them from herds that graze rugged
pastures should increase uniformity of grazing with more use of
upland slopes and less use of bottoms and riparian areas. Multiple
observations are needed to characterize the grazing patterns of
individual cows. Observations should be recorded in the early morning
when cattle are grazing and more emphasis should be made during
the first third of the grazing season. Using breeds that were developed
in topography and climate that is similar to rangeland conditions
of the ranch also should help resolve livestock distribution problems.
Although results from this project clearly showed that selection
has the potential to solve many issues associated with grazing,
much more research is needed before this practice can be widely
recommended and implemented.
Page: 1
| 2 | 3 | Next
Section
Top
|