Home
Publications
Ag Innovations home

In-House Composting in High-Rise, Caged Layer Facilities

Introduction

High-rise, Caged Layer Facilities

An Overview of In-House Composting

Managing Compost Inside Poultry Facilities

Economic Evaluation

SARE Research Synopsis

References

About the Authors


Printable Version

Did this Fact Sheet prompt you to make any changes to your farming operation? This and other feedback is greatly appreciated!
Agricultural Innovations   Practical Applications for Sustainable Agriculture - Fact Sheet

In-House Composting in High-Rise, Caged Layer Facilities

eggs
Researchers found annual savings of $6,000 per hen house per year. Ohio State University Photo Library.

Economic Evaluation

Cooperators on this project reported cost savings associated with reduced pesticide use for fly control, removal of less material from the buildings at cleanout, and the production of a higher value and saleable product. Additional costs were incurred for turning the compost. Based on partial budget analysis including these costs, annual savings equaled $6,000 per building per year. Total annual savings at a 330,000 laying hen facility was approximately $30,000. This was equivalent to a 65% reduction in costs associated with pesticides and manure removal and disposal. Overall, the greatest cost reduction was realized from reducing the amount of pesticide used. The savings offset the costs of new compost turners and other equipment required for in-house composting in less than three years. Additional opportunities were created to use waste cardboard and egg shells from a cracking operation as a carbon source and amendment, respectively, to the compost.


 

 

 


Next Section

 

 
SARE Logo Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE)