Sustainable Crop Rotations with Cover Crops

Sustainable Crop Rotations with Cover Crops

Sustainable Crop Rotations with Cover Crops

Cover crops offer many benefits for agriculture that include erosion control; reduced compaction and nutrient leaching; increased water infiltration; improved soil biodiversity; weed control and disease suppression; increased carbon sequestration and maximum nutrient recycling; improved air, soil, and water quality; and wildlife enhancement. Every cover crop species has its own niche and attributes for agricultural production.

Legume cover crops are commonly used for nitrogen contribution because of their inherent capacity to fix atmospheric N (inert gas) into usable form to be used by succeeding crops. Grass cover crops are widely used for soil erosion control, forages, improving soil structure and reducing compaction, carbon sequestration, recycling nutrients, and weed control. The Brassicas are good for reducing compaction, recycling nutrients, and weed control and disease suppression. Buckwheat is neither a legume nor grass but is a fast-growing summer cover crop and can be used for nutrient recycling (e.g. phosphorus), honeybees, and allelopathy.

This fact sheet produced by SARE Graduate Student Grant recipient, James Hoorman, provides information about specific attributes of different cover crops grown after each cash crop.

Want more information? See the related SARE grant(s) GNC08-093, Recycling Nutrients with Cover Crops to Decrease Hypoxia/Eutrophication while Promoting Sustainable Crop Production .

Product specs
Year: 2009
Length: 6 Pages
Author(s): Jim Hoorman, Rafiq Islam, Alan Sundermeier
Location: North Central | Northeast | Ohio | South | West
How to order
Online Version (Free):

Only available online

This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture through the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.