• WebStore |
  • Advanced Search |
  • MySARE Login |
  • SARE Social Media |
  • Contact Us |
  • SANET Listserv |
  • Low Bandwidth |
Search MySARE Reports
  • Grants
    • Apply for a Grant
    • Funded Grants in Your State
  • Project Reports
    • Submit a Report
    • Search the Database
    • Project Search Tips
    • About Project Reports
    • About Search Results
    • Project Products
  • Learning Center
    • Books
    • Bulletins
    • Fact Sheets
    • Topic Rooms
    • From the Field
    • Newsletters
    • Multimedia
    • Courses and Curricula
    • Project Products
    • SARE Biennial Reports
    • SANET Listserv
    • SARE Program Materials
    • Conference Materials
    • WebStore
  • Professional Development
    • PDP Overview
    • Fellows & Search for Excellence Programs
    • Sample PDP Grant Projects
    • Educator Curriculum Guides
    • National Continuing Education Program
    • State Coordinator Contact Information
  • State Programs
    • State Coordinator Program Overview
    • State Coordinator Contact Information
    • Funded Grants in Your State
  • Events
    • Event Calendar
    • Past Conferences
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • SARE in the News
    • Media Contacts
    • Newsletters
    • Media Toolkit
    • A Guide To This Site
    • SARE and Social Media
  • About SARE
    • SARE's Four Regions
    • SARE Grants
    • Learning Center
    • Professional Development
    • SARE Outreach
    • Historical Timeline
    • Staff
    • Vision & Mission
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • What is Sustainable Agriculture?
  • Home»
  • Learning Center»
  • Books»
  • Manage Insects on Your Farm»
  • Text Version»
  • Farm Feature: Triple Threat to Pests: Cover Crops, No-Till, Rotation»
  • Impacts of Fertilizers on Insect Pests
facebook
Twitter
YouTube
- + Font Size
Print
Share

Text Version

  • Acknowledgments
  • Introduction
  • Table of Contents
  • How Ecologically Based Pest Management Works
  • Principles of Ecologically Based Pest Management
  • Identification Key to Major Beneficials and Pests
  • Managing Soils to Minimize Crop Pests
  • Farm Feature: Triple Threat to Pests: Cover Crops, No-Till, Rotation
    • Impacts of Fertilizers on Insect Pests
    • Table 2. Pest Populations Increase With Excess Nitrogen Fertility
    • Implications for Fertilizer Practices
  • Beneficial Agents on the Farm
  • Putting it All Together
  • Resources: General Information
  • Printable Version

Can't find something? Ask or send feedback.

SARE's mission is to advance—to the whole of American agriculture—innovations that improve profitability, stewardship and quality of life by investing in groundbreaking research and education. SARE's vision is...

Impacts of Fertilizers on Insect Pests

Impacts of Fertilizers on Insect Pests

By modifying the nutrient composition of crops, fertilizer practices can influence plant defenses. A review of 50 years of research identified 135 studies showing more plant damage and/or greater numbers of leaf-chewing insects or mites in nitrogen-fertilized crops, while fewer than 50 studies reported less pest damage. Researchers have demonstrated that high nitrogen levels in plant tissue can decrease resistance and increase susceptibility to pest attacks (Table 2). Although more research is needed to clarify the relationships between crop nutrition and pests, most studies assessing the response of aphids and mites to nitrogen fertilizer have documented dramatic expansion in pest numbers with increases in fertilizer rates.

Crops could be expected, therefore, to be less prone to insect pests and diseases where organic soil amendments are used, since these amendments usually result in lower concentrations of soluble nitrogen in plant tissue. Indeed, most studies documenting fewer insect pests in organic systems have attributed these reductions in part to lower nitrogen content in the crop tissues:

In Japan, the density of whitebacked planthopper (Sogatella furcifera) immigrants in organic rice fields was significantly less than their density in conventional rice fields. Fewer adult females settled in the organic fields and fewer immatures survived, leading to smaller ensuing generations. These results have been partly attributed to lower nitrogen content in the organically farmed crops.

In England, conventional winter wheat fields were plagued with more rose-grain aphids than their organic counterpart. Top-dressed in April with nitrogen, the plants treated with soluble synthetic fertilizers contained higher levels of free protein amino acids in their leaves in June and attracted larger populations of aphids. Researchers concluded that the aphids found the conventionally grown wheat to be more palatable than the organically grown wheat.

In Ohio greenhouse experiments, European corn borer females laid significantly more eggs on sweet corn growing in conventionally fertilized soils than they did on plants growing in organically farmed soils collected nearby. Interestingly, egg-laying varied significantly among the chemically fertilized treatments but was uniformly low in organically managed soils. The difference appears to be evidence for a form of biological buffering more commonly found under organic conditions.

In California, organically fertilized broccoli consistently developed smaller infestations of flea beetles and cabbage aphids than conventionally fertilized broccoli. Researchers attributed those reduced infestations to lower levels of free nitrogen in plant foliage, further supporting the view that farmers can influence insect pest preferences with the types and amounts of fertilizers they use.

In tropical Asia, by increasing organic matter in irrigated rice, researchers enhanced populations of decomposers and plankton-feeders — key components in the food chain of predators; in turn, numbers of generalist predators of leafhopper pests rose significantly. Organic matter management proved to underlie higher levels of natural biological control.

Previous Section | Top | Next Section


You are reading the SARE book Manage Insects on Your Farm.

Order this publication.

25th SARE logo USDA Logo

1122 Patapsco Building | University of Maryland | College Park, MD 20742-6715

This Web site is maintained by the national outreach office of the SARE program, supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

North Central SARE | Northeast SARE | Southern SARE | Western SARE

Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education ©2012

  • Help |
  • RSS Feeds |
  • A Guide To This Site